"Colorado
is a land of contrasts. You have the very liberal capital city of Denver where
Governor Hickenlooper was the mayor of the city and nearby University of
Colorado at Boulder. The city has seen a boom in the medical marijuana
industry. Travel south on I-25 and you end up in Colorado Springs home of the
conservative organization Focus on the Family."
That
is what I wrote in October 2012 in my analysis of the swing states leading up
to that year's presidential election.
Now
that I live in Colorado I can provide a more detailed observation on Colorado
politics.
Since
then a lot has happened in Colorado. President Obama won Colorado in November
2012. His result in Colorado closely mirrored that of the national popular
vote. According to Nate Silver, Colorado was
the tipping point state in that cycle. It was also Obama's tipping
point state in 2008.
Democrats at The Lege General Assembly in Denver kept control of the
state senate and were able to
take back control of the state house.
In
that same election voters approved a ballot initiative that allowed the sale of
marijuana for recreational purposes and went into effect in January 2014. The state
legislature in 2013 passed stronger
background checks prior to purchasing firearms that resulted in one
state senator being recalled and another resigning that same year.
Also
that same year the state legislature passed a civil
unions bill
that allowed same-sex couples some recognition of their relationship. Marriage
equality officially came
to Colorado
this month when the Supreme Court refused to hear challenges from the 10th
Circuit Court of Appeals on the constitutionality of banning same-sex couples
from marrying.
For
the second time in four years, Colorado has a competitive senate race and it
could determine which party controls the Senate for the next two years.
As
I have mentioned in a
previous writing about the Colorado Republican Party, they have tried to
make gains in Colorado but have failed in previous cycles trying to capture the
two most visible statewide seats: US Senator and Colorado Governor.
The
trend began in 2004 when Ken Salazar won despite the
state sending its 9 electoral votes to President George W. Bush. In 2006, Bill
Ritter won the gubernatorial election in a year that was favorable for
Democrats that cycle. Senator Mark Udall (CO, D) was elected to the US Senate
in 2008. Like a lot of senators that were elected that cycle, they were part
the wave election that increased the Democratic majorities in Congress and the
presidential election of Barack Obama. Udall won his senate race 53-42, nearly
mirroring Obama's 54-45 Colorado result.
In
2010, the Republicans ran Ken Buck for US Senate.
The polls and forecasters predicted that
Buck would be the next Senator from Colorado. Michael Bennett, who was
appointed to replace Salazar when he was nominated to head the Interior
Department, won that election 48-47. In that same
election former Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper was elected
governor over Tom Tancredo who opted to
run as a third party candidate after losing the 2010 Republican primary and
ending up losing that year's
Colorado gubernatorial by a 51-36 margin.
Now
both Udall and Hickenlooper are facing tough re-election campaigns.
Governor
Hickenlooper is going up against former Congressman Bob Beauprez. In 2006 Beauprez
declined to run for another term in Colorado's 7th congressional district and
opted to run for governor. He lost by 17 points. He also has a long history of
saying crazy things in the past eight years. Earlier this year a tape surfaced
from a speech he gave four years ago that had a similar tone as Mitt
Romney's 47% comments.
Udall
was originally slated to go against Ken Buck, but the Colorado Republican Party
wised up and decided to allow Cory Gardner (CO-4, R) to run for the US Senate
and let Ken Buck run in Gardner's district. As of this writing I currently live
in CO-4 and it is VERY likely that Ken Buck will be my representative come
January 2015 because the district has a Cook VPI
of R+12 as it encompasses most of eastern Colorado.
If
you recall in November 2013 several counties in northeastern Colorado voted to
secede from the state. The only other time that has happened was West Virginia
forming their own state from Virginia in 1863 during the Civil War. The vote to
form North Colorado was a fool's errand because you would have needed approval
from the state of Colorado and then approval from the federal government.
In
the 11 counties where that question was on the ballot, 6
voted against forming a new state but officials said they would look into
resolving the urban-rural divide that exists in our state.
Gardner
was the Republican's best hope to win the senate seat given the candidate
field. Though the polls are showing Gardner leading it is probably much closer
than people think.
Colorado
is a swing state, but due to its demographics it is a trending blue
battleground state and because of the work that the Colorado Democratic Party
has put into turning it into a state they have won in the last two presidential
elections and the 2010 senate and gubernatorial elections (ahem, Texas, you
REALLY should be listening to this).
One
thing that the Colorado Democrats have in their favor is the ground game. I
have been block walking, canvassing, and phone banking for Senator Udall and
Andrew Romanoff in CO-6. I have also done phone banking for Governor
Hickenlooper and Attorney General candidate Don Quick with the LGBT
organization One Colorado.
During
my runs into the Denver suburb of Centennial I have seen yard signs for various
Republican candidates, but here is the thing about yard signs: they don't knock
on doors, make phone calls, and most importantly they don't vote.
I
have made phone calls for Democratic candidates. My family members and I that
live in Colorado have yet to receive Republicans phone calls. Now two family
members and I have Texas area codes. And there is a funny story about this.
During a phone bank in September, I got a phone call from the county Democratic
Party inviting me to a dinner. The thing was that the person calling me was at
the same phone bank as I was.
I
have blocked walked for Senator Udall and Congressional Candidate Romanoff in
Highlands Ranch. Though it is a safe Republican area, I have yet to see
Republican block walkers. None have left literature or knocked on my door.
During a recent canvassing, I saw a Democratic state rep candidate knocking on
doors.
I
have left literature on voters' doors I have in my canvassing packet about
voting in Colorado and Andrew Romanoff. The items I have seen on doors has been
sales and a Planned Parenthood door hanger. During a recent canvassing I saw
literature from the Koch Brother's backed Americans For Prosperity on three
doors. That brings the total to: three.
The
polls have consistently shown Cory Gardner leading in the polls among likely
voters but only within the margin of error. Recently a few polls have come out
showing Mark Udall leading, but again it is within the margin of error.
Four
years ago, Ken Buck was in the same position as Cory Gardner. Though Gardner
has been consistently leading in recent polls, here are some things that I
think that will lead to a Udall victory.
For
starters the above mentioned turnout operation. The Democratic turnout machine
in Colorado is based here in the state. The Republican turnout machine is
relying on the Koch Brothers and Karl Rove. Yes, THAT Karl Rove who like the
Koch Brothers have been running ads on television through his organization
Crossroads GPS.
Which
I ask: why hasn't Rove disappeared after he wasted all those rich peoples'
dollars trying to defeat Obama in 2012?
In
2010, that Democratic turnout machine saved Senator Michael Bennett. It should
be expected to save Senator Udall and Governor Hickenlooper.
The
second factor is Jefferson County or as the natives call it "JeffCo".
This suburban county located west of Denver is key to who wins the state. In
2008 Obama carried JeffCo by a 9
point margin. In 2010 Hickenlooper won JeffCo 51-42
while Bennett's win that county that year was 48-46.
And in 2012, Obama won JeffCo 51-47
closely mirroring the statewide result and the national popular vote.
As
the saying goes: "As JeffCo goes, so goes Colorado."
The
JeffCo school board has received a lot of national attention in part due to the
rightward direction it took after the 2013 elections. Teachers have walked out
due to pay disputes and students have protested the new proposed AP curriculum
that only highlights the so-called positive aspects of American history. It
should be noted that this curriculum proposition has its roots from Texas.
The
rightward direction of the school board is traced to one issue: Democrats DID
NOT show up to vote in that 2013 election. I'm sure they are ready to enact
some ballot revenge and take their anger out on anyone who has an R next to
their name.
And
there is one more item and it has to do with one of the initiatives that is on
my ballot here in Colorado.
Personhood
Personhood
is the concept that anytime an egg and a sperm join together in fertilization
it is considered a person. This effort is seeking to ban abortion and also
certain types of birth control. The consequences of this being passed is that
could also impact couples who depend on in vitro fertilization in order to have
children of their own.
This
is not the first attempt to change the Colorado constitution. In 2008, the
question was posed as Amendment 48. It failed:
73-27.
One
of the sponsors of personhood is Cory Gardner who is running for the US Senate.
Gardner said in March 2014 that
he no longer supports personhood, but he still
supports it in the House despite his commercials and his platform supporting
over the counter contraception.
Gardner
tried to say that he no longer supports personhood during the final senate debate, but the moderators called
Gardner out on his position.
The
only way that Gardner can take his name off the bill is if he was to give a
speech on the House floor saying he no longer supports it.
The
House will be returning to work never until after the midterm elections.
No
dummy. I may have taken high school health in Texas, but even I know that is
not correct.
Because
of their inability to distance themselves from the extreme social issues of
their party, they will lose
in Colorado.
It will probably mirror that of 2010, but I cannot imagine a scenario where
personhood goes down at the ballot and Gardner winning. For the second
consecutive election and also like in 2010 the Republicans will have snatched
defeat from the jaws of victory in their efforts to regain the majority in the
Senate.
The
one factor is whose supporters will show up at the polls.
I
am ready with my ballot.
No comments:
Post a Comment