During
a 10 PM newscast of 9 NEWS in Denver this month, it was reported
that Republican candidate for Colorado governor Bob Beauprez said, "we've got almost half of the
population perfectly happy that somebody else is paying the bill" and "I submit to you that there is a
political strategy to get slightly over half and have a permanent ruling
political majority by keeping over half of the population dependent on the
largesse of government that somebody else is paying for."
Those
comments were made before the Denver Rotary Club in April 2010. Those comments appear at the 5:30 mark of
the video.
Why
does this sound familiar?
If
you recall in 2012, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney was caught on
tape (Part 1, Part 2) during
a fundraiser dinner earlier in the year saying this:
There are 47 percent of the people who
will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who
are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are
victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who
believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to
you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to
them. And they will vote for this president no matter what…These are people who
pay no income tax.
And:
My job is not to worry about those
people. I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and
care for their lives.
On
6 November 2012 this happened:
Not
only did President Obama win with a convincing result in the electoral college
with 332 electoral votes, but Obama won 51% of the popular vote.
Romney's
popular vote share: 47
PERCENT.
Mother
Jones, who
broke the story of Romney's 47% comments, went even
further by pointing out that Romney won 47% of the vote in the 12 swing
states and in the other states Romney won 47.49% of the vote.
Now
it appears that "47%" has resurfaced in 2014. This time it is in the
Colorado gubernatorial election.
For
the Beauprez campaign this couldn't come at a worse time. It has overshadowed his
pick for Lieutenant Governor, Douglas County Commissioner Jill Repella. She
spent three years on the Douglas County School Board prior to being elected
county commissioner in 2008 and again in 2012.
Repella
worked in commercial architecture, aerospace, and construction prior to
entering politics. She is a fifth generation Coloradan who is a single mother
with three children. She describes herself as a pro-life Catholic and is a graduate
of Denver University and Colorado State University.
Nominating
Repella is believed to combat the story that the Republicans are not in touch
with women's issues and also to balance the ticket with someone based in the
Denver area as the belief in Colorado is that a
non-Denver Area candidate cannot win a statewide election. Douglas County
is located south of Denver but is part
of the metropolitan area while Beauprez is based in Loveland, 46 miles
north of Denver in Larimer County.
In the last three biannual elections, Larimer County has gone for the Democratic
candidate while Douglas County has gone for the Republican candidate with the
exception of the 2010 Colorado gubernatorial election when the county went for
Tom Tancredo as a candidate for the American Constitution Party (2008
Presidential, 2008
Senate, 2010
Governor, 2010
Senate, 2012
Presidential).
Beauprez
and Repella went on a unity tour of the state to promote the ticket
and unite Republicans in defeating Governor Hickenlooper in November. The
revelation of these comments does not exactly inspire unity.
Colorado
Democratic Party Chairman Rick Palacio released
this statement:
"It's shocking that a candidate
for Governor would basically accuse half of the population of being
freeloaders. Not only is Beauprez out of touch, but his elitist remarks show
that he has no respect for Colorado's seniors, our veterans or the hard working
families that are struggling to get by. After Coloradans have worked together
to recover from fires and floods, the last thing we need is the divisive type
of rhetoric that Bob Beauprez has spent his career peddling."
The
47% comment was damaging for the Romney campaign and the similar comments made
by Beauprez will certainly not only harm his gubernatorial aspirations but will
impact the other Republican candidate running for a major statewide office in
2014. In my post about the Colorado
Republican Gubernatorial Primary, both Gardner and Beauprez have serious
issues that will drag either candidate down.
Gardner
has a well documented history of pushing
for personhood and redefining
rape. Then there is Amendment
67 which is another attempt to amend the Colorado Constitution to redefine
personhood. It will appear on the ballot this coming November. Attempts at
personhood has appeared on the ballot in Colorado in 2008 and 2010 and both
times were rejected by over 70% of the voters. Even though the Udall-Gardner
race is close according to Real
Clear Politics, an NBC
News/Marist Poll conducted in July among registered voters showed Senator Udall
with a 7 point lead. Contributing to Udall's overall lead is his
50-38 advantage with women voters and advertisements like these:
Meanwhile
the gubernatorial election is showing a different animal. While the polls per Real
Clear Politics are showing a tightening election, it does not tell the
entire story. Again the same NBC
News/Marist Poll conducted the same time period as the Udall-Gardner poll
shows Governor Hickenlooper up by 6 points. Yet, I have not seen an ads for
either Governor Hickenlooper or Bob Beauprez appear on television at this time.
Beauprez ran for governor in 2006 and lost by 17 points. While the conditions
for that election are
totally different than the conditions leading up to this November's election,
it seems like Beauprez might be headed towards another electoral defeat.
And
now there are these
comments.
I
will repeat it: the rightward direction of the Republican Party may play well
in Texas, but in Colorado there are electoral consequences for going in that
direction.
As
seen in 2010, it was revealed that then-US Senate candidate Ken Buck
told a rape victim that she had buyer's remorse back when he was the Weld
County District Attorney in 2005, compared to being gay to
alcoholism in a debate on Meet The
Press (which
prompted this response by a psychologist in the Denver Area), and stated his position of no abortions
even in the case of rape and incest.
And
then there was Tom Tancredo's third party run for governor.
The
result? Michael Bennett was elected to his own term as US Senator and John Hickenlooper
was elected governor of Colorado. It was one of the few bright spots for
Democrats on Election
Night 2010.
Election
Day 2014 is now 100 days from today and I don't think Beauprez can recover from
the revelation of these statements. There are still a lot story left to write
about this election, but I cannot see Governor Hickenlooper not being sworn in
for a second term in January 2015. Demonizing 47% of the electorate did not
work well for Mitt Romney in 2012 and it will not work for Bob Beauprez.
It
should also be noted that Bob Beauprez has the
endorsement from Mr. 47%, Mitt Romney.
Colorado
Republicans think that Colorado Democrats fear Bob Beauprez…
I
think the Colorado Republicans fear that Beauprez will end up costing them
another high profile statewide election.
No comments:
Post a Comment