I might
have been a TAD abrasive in my critiques of third parties, but the truth is
that one of these two people will be elected president tommorrow.
To
the undecided voters that remain and especially those that live in competitive
states, ask yourself this: you have two candidates for a job. One group, A, thoroughly
vetted their two major choices and one person emerged. The other group, B,
vetted 17 people and one person emerged out of that group.
Group
A’s candidate was as an administrator, played an active role in community
service, is well versed in international relationships, and knows the inner
workings of how the company work. The candidate has detailed knowledge about
the makeup of the company’s employees, their issues, and is constantly studying
on ways to improve their lives. Group A’s candidate has an issue with record
keeping but has been cleared of any wrongdoing.
While
Group B’s candidate despite a business background has a well-documented history
of sexual harassment, discrimination, prejudice, promoting a hostile work
environment, and has not disclosed any financial records that have been
requested. Group B’s candidate also has looming unresolved legal issues.
The
company will pick one of these two candidates. A third option is not viable.
Selecting a third option means that your choice will be noted, but will likely
result in a candidate you despise running this complex company and its
employees for the next four years.
Obviously,
Group A’s candidate is highly qualified but has flaws. There is no such thing
as a perfect candidate. B’s candidate could potentially damage the reputation
of the company that would take years to recover from, and the morale of the
employees would drop.
The
time for choosing is upon us.
Choose
wisely
No comments:
Post a Comment