Incumbent-Senator
Mark Kirk faced challenger Representative Tammy Duckworth in the Illinois
Senate debate on back in October.
There
were two statements that stood out.
The
first was Duckworth’s response about one of the things that has been missing
from this general election debate: a real hard substantive discussion about war
and peace, and the people who will be impacted by the decisions (or rather the
lack of decisions) made in Washington.
The
United States has been involved in Afghanistan for 15 years and is mission
creeping into other parts of the Middle East due to the fight against ISIS.
Consider
this, a young person might have enlisted in one of the armed forces at the age
of 18 in September 2001. The soldier, sailor, Marine, or airman might have done
multiple deployments to either Afghanistan, Iraq, or been in the Persian Gulf
theater.
The
service member most likely would have a pretty impressive war chest on their
uniform by now that tells many stories – the comraderies, the horrors, and the
mundane of being at war. Now after 15 years that service member is a senior
non-commissioned officer preparing for yet another deployment. Perhaps
Afghanistan. In the aged service member’s unit is a newly trained service
member fresh from boot camp and advanced training who was born in January 1998.
If
we are still in Afghanistan in some capacity by October 2018, the military
could start seeing enlistees who were born on or after 11 September 2001 and
serving alongside service members who have served in the Global War on Terror
during that time period. Many will be approaching retirement and are
battle-hardened while the new entries will have lived in a time period where
the US has always been in Afghanistan which has now surpassed our longest
military engagement.
Honestly,
Congress is unreliable on addressing what exactly is our mission overseas. They
are too afraid to even discuss an Authorization the Use of Military Force
(AUMF) against ISIS or redefine the mission in Afghanistan or the overall
Global War on Terror because with that vote comes the political consequences.
And
Congress has been derelict in their duties for too long to take up this issue
as they are too busy with the dog & pony show of ObamaCare repeal votes,
the kangaroo court that is the Benghazi investigation and Hillary Clinton’s
e-mails, the refusal to address firearm violence, and the shameful act of
letting Flint, MI continue to drink lead-laced water.
This
is the People’s House and since it is such, I at least expect them to do one of
their jobs to discuss matters of war and peace. They control the budgets for
defense, state, intelligence, and other departments that are associated with
foreign and domestic security.
I
doubt that Donald Trump can tell anybody what AUMF stands for, and I doubt that
his handlers even bothered to.
So,
the next president (hopefully Hillary Clinton) will have some tough decisions
to make about our foreign engagements.
Expect
the same cast of characters who beat the drums for Iraq in 2002 to do the same
for another Middle Eastern war or remain in Afghanistan for another 10 years.
And
if Duckworth is a senator, which is likely given the polls and that exchange
from the debate, you can expect Tammy Duckworth to provide an example as the
cost of war.
“My
family has served this nation in uniform, going back to the Revolution. I’m a
daughter of the American Revolution. I’ve bled for this nation But I still want
to be there in the Senate when the drums of war sound. Families like mine are
the ones that bleed first. But let’s make sure the American people understand
what we are engaging in, and let’s hold our allies accountable, because we
can’t do it all.”
The
second part came from the Kirk.
“I
had forgotten that your parents came all the way from Thailand to serve George
Washington.”
Kirk
should know fucking better
Kirk,
like Duckworth, is a veteran. He is a retired Navy commander having served most
of his time in the reserves with a few callups to active duty in the late
1990s, early 2000s. Duckworth’s proof of her service is more visible than
anyone’s.
She
also can trace her lineage back to the Revolutionary War through her father’s
side, also an Army officer.
When
I read and eventually saw those comments, I was livid. I am tired of one political
party using veterans as a game piece. They thank us for our service and claim
to fight for our issues only to then turn around to say we don’t have our
priorities in order. I’m looking at you Senator Richard Burr (NC, R).
Or a
California Congressman getting upset about California National Guardsmen having
to repay bonuses… except that he had the power to do something about it when it
brought to his attention two years ago
Or a
Colorado Congressman who sits on the appropriations committee and is upset
about the cost overruns concerning a new VA Hospital in his district
Or the
Republican nominee saying that Senator John McCain (AZ, R) who I disagree with
on a whole lot of issues but I respect his service and sacrifice greatly, was
“not a hero for being captured” by his party’s standard bearer. And yet McCain
did not condemn him in order to win his senate primary and abandoned him after the
revelations of a lewd comment caught on tape were revealed.
Or
the same person accepting a Purple Heart and saying he always wanted one…
considering that several Purple Hearts are awarded posthumously
Or
insulting a Gold Star family whose son made the ultimate sacrifice and would
have no place in the Republican nominee’s America because of his assumed
background. The nominee then insulated that the son would be alive if he was
president claiming that he never supported the Iraq War. The evidence says
otherwise.
In
this election, we the people, certainly deserved a robust debate about the type
of country we should seek to be. I strongly felt that war and peace, foreign
policy, and veterans’ affairs would get discussed since for the last 15 years
we have been at war… for a very small percentage of the population. The last 15
years has been a different experience for those in the military compared to
those that spent their lives in the civilian sphere. For the most part uninterrupted
without being asked to sacrifice. While those in uniform have been continued to
ask to sacrifice more and more and more without much objection.
And
we should know better
No comments:
Post a Comment