Two
highly visible politicians recently stated their support for marriage equality.
The
first was Senator Rob Portman, a Republican from Ohio who was rumored to be on
a shortlist of possible running mates with Mitt Romney during the 2012
Presidential Election. In an interview with CNN Portman stated his change due
to his son telling his parents that he is gay back in 2011. Portman was
previously a member of the US House and was a co-sponsor of the Defense of
Marriage Act (DOMA) back in 1996.
The
announcement came before the annual CPAC convention that took place last
weekend in National Harbor, Maryland. It appears that there is a split among
conservatives regarding marriage equality. Though a recent
ABC News-Washington Post poll shows Republicans supporting same-sex
marriage at 34%, there is a split between Republicans currently holding office
and former office holders. One of the biggest champions of Maryland's marriage
equality measure in 2012 was former Vice-President Dick Cheney.
Yes,
THAT Dick Cheney.
One
the attorneys arguing in favor of overturning Prop 8 is Ted Olson. You may
remember him as Bush's Solicitor General from June 2001 to July 2004 and argued
for his client in the controversial Supreme Court decision Bush v. Gore (2000) that gave George W. Bush the state of Florida
in the 2000 Presidential Election and thus the election. He also portrayed
Vice-President Biden during Rep. Paul Ryan's debate preparation.
In
a surprising twist, the other lawyer arguing for overturning Prop 8 case is
David Boies who argued for Gore in
the above mentioned Bush v. Gore
(2000).
Talk
about strange political bedfellows...
Late
last month several Republicans signed on to filed amicus briefs urging the
Supreme Court to overturn Proposition 8. One those briefs was stating the
obvious that marriage
equality will protect children. Some of the names associated with these
marriage equality briefs are: Ken Mehlman, Steve Schmidt, Nicolle Wallace, Tom
Ridge, Meg Whitman, Gary Johnson, David Stockman, Carlos
Gutierrez, Christine Todd Whitman, and Clint Eastwood.
Here's
something all these people have in common... a lot of these people are FORMER
office holders. Having former office holders and visible persons (such as David
Stockman who was in OBM during the Reagan administration and renounced Supply
Side Economics) is great, but can any of them create and enact legislative
policies that are beneficial to LGBT Persons?
(You
can answer that question: it is no.)
Only
TWO elected Republicans in Congress have signed on to these legal briefs
stating their support for marriage equality: Representatives Ileana
Ros-Lehtinen of Florida and Richard Hanna of New York. Total number of
Republican Senators and Governors currently in office stating their support for
marriage equality: ZERO.
It
appears that the National GOP is recognizing that they have to get with the
changing times if they are to be competitive in Presidential politics. The same
can be said about other issues, but the topic right now is marriage equality
and let's stick with that right now.
The
beginning for the GOP to becoming a better party appears to be the issue of
LGBT Rights. One of the telling signs of this
shift was this picture at CPAC:
The
image on the left is a discussion held by the National Organization for
Marriage talking to a nearly empty room. The image on the right is pro-LGBT
conservatives discussing how to advocate marriage for all in a room that was nearly
standing room only.
I
will believe that the GOP will have turned the corner on LGBT Rights when they
start listening to the overall data shown in the opinion polls, not just to
what their party thinks on the issue. In addition it would be helpful if they
ceased aligning themselves with groups such as the misnamed National Organization
for Marriage and more Republican legislators at all levels co-authored/co-signed
pro-LGBT legislation and policies.
And
then there was this interview with Speaker of The House John Boehner:
Yeah...
I'm not holding my breath.
The
other stated support for marriage equality came from Former Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton in the above video from the Human Rights Campaign.
Clinton
is rumored to be eying a 2016 Presidential run on the Democratic ticket. If she
does run, not only is it likely that she will win her party's nomination but
she could make history as the first woman elected President of the United States.
I
have nothing against the Clintons. Her husband, former President Bill Clinton,
was an effective executive in the 1990s and has shown to be one of our better post-presidency
statesmen while Ms. Clinton has emerged as her own political person as a good
Secretary of State during President Obama's first term. A lot of my Democratic
connections are proclaiming that she must and will run in 2016. Me... I'm on
the wait-and-see side before following everyone to the Hillary 2016 Bandwagon.
I kind of want to see how the field materializes.
And
it's too early to break the "2016 Elections" seal. One of the downers
of American Politics: the never-ending campaign cycle.
And
also I haven't heard these words come out of her mouth: "I'm Hillary Clinton, and I am running for President."
But
Ms. Clinton's statement shows what a potential 2016 Democratic Presidential
Primary could look like. Ten years ago if any Democrat said they were
pro-marriage equality they were viewed as having no chance of winning a general
election let alone the primary. Now it's a political advantage in Democratic
politics. Governor John Hickenlooper signed Colorado's Civil Union bill,
Governor Martin O'Malley campaigned for Maryland's marriage equality measure
last cycle, and there
was President Obama's interview with ABC News' Robin Roberts back in May 2012.
Hickenlooper and O'Malley are seen as making a possible run at the White House
in 2016. It will be next to impossible for a Democrat to run for President
without having some form of LGBT Equality measure and/or statement on their political
résumé.
Overall
Clinton, Portman, and the various amicus briefs that have come out in support
for marriage equality should be viewed as a pre-emptive strike. On this coming
Tuesday and Wednesday the Supreme Court will be hearing two high profile
marriage equality cases. Tuesday will be the Prop 8 Case, Hollingsworth
v. Perry (12-144). Wednesday is the DOMA Case, United
States v. Windsor (12-307). The decisions are expected to come out in
June.... which is when there are a lot of LGBT Pride Parades... it was also the
same month Loving
v. Virginia (1967) was released.
The
times are indeed a changin', and this is an exciting time to be a part of that.
No comments:
Post a Comment