For
those unfamiliar with the word, this has two definitions but comes to a point
given Wednesday’s events in the US Senate.
The
first is one of a historical reference. The namesake of this definition comes
from the Norwegian politician and military officer Vidkun Quisling. During
World War II, he was installed in 1940 as the puppet Prime Minister of Norway
during Nazi Germany’s occupation of said country. Upon the end of the European
theater of World War II in May 1945, newly liberated Norway began its moment of
cleansing itself and sought justice by placing those on trial who aided and
collaborated with their Nazi oppressors.
Quisling
was found guilty of several charges that included embezzlement, murder, and
high treason against Norway. His sentence: death by firing squad on 24 October
1945.
This
was also the fate for others who followed Quisling’s path. One of his cabinet
ministers, Ragnar Sigvald Skancke, was also executed by firing squad in August
1948. He is the last person to be sentenced to death in Norway and the country
abolished the use of the death penalty in 1979.
Uttering
the word quisling in Norway is equivalent to calling someone a Benedict Arnold
in the United States.
The
other is from a work of fiction.
In
“World War Z” (highly recommend the audiobook), the phrase is used to describe
humans who begin to act like zombies as a way of compensating for the shock
that came with the onset of the zombie apocalypse.
Quislings
in this usage did a lot of damage in the efforts to eradicate the zombie
scourge. Observers believed that zombies were attacking each other but it was
zombies attacking quislings since they could tell the difference. Also aiding
in the chaos was Phalanx, a vaccine that was supposedly effective against
zombification, but didn’t work. Neighborhood patrols and the military had
difficulties in discerning the difference between zombies and quislings because
they acted so similar that in many instances led to fatal consequences. Because
quislings were so mentally lost, there was little effort to rehabilitate them
back into society.
On
Wednesday, 52 Senators became Quislings in agreeing that Trump should not be
removed from office for abuse of power and congressional obstruction due to
withholding military aid to Ukraine and in exchange for that aid Ukraine would
launch an investigation into Hunter Biden’s activities into that country in an
effort to damage former vice-president Joe Biden’s presidential campaign.
Much
like Quisling, these 52 agreed that it was acceptable for a president to
welcome foreign influence into the political system and if caught, that it is
acceptable for a president to block, stonewall, and intimidate witnesses into
not providing the information necessary to enter the public record.
And
as long as the president’s party controls at least one chamber of Congress, the
president can get away with it and claim acquittal while the senate leader runs
enough interference to prevent the calling of witnesses and testimony to the
president’s misbehavior.
All
of the 52 could fill the role of Quisling but one specifically comes to mind:
Senator Mitch McConnell. Throughout the 2010s, McConnell as the Republican
Senate leader in both roles as minority and majority leader has sought to
undermine the Constitution in a quest for power. As minority leader, he vowed
to make Barack Obama a one-term president. That backfired spectacularly when
Obama was re-elected in 2012.
Still,
McConnell did everything he could to gum up the works in the senate to allow
several federal judicial positions to remain vacant as well efforts to abuse
the filibuster to block meaningful legislation.
McConnell
was delayed in becoming the senate majority leader across two election cycles;
the first being in 2010 due to Republicans nominating dangerously
underqualified candidates in Delaware, Nevada, and Colorado and 2012 was
highlighted by candidates in Indiana and Missouri who expressed abhorrent views
concerning rape.
The
magnum opus of McConnell’s conversion into Quisling was in 2016 when the
senator refused to allow Merrick Garland, Obama’s selection for the Supreme
Court vacated due to the death of Antoni Scalia, to go through the confirmation
process due to citing some never heard of precedent about it being an election
year. Where was that precedent when McConnell pushed the confirmation of Brent
Kavanaugh through in 2018, also an election year? McConnell as well as House
Speaker Paul Ryan refused to join with President Obama in condemning potential
Russian interference in the 2016 election putting their party’s electoral
chances ahead of the national security of the country.
If
only 20 Republican senators had the courage to break ranks to find Trump guilty
on at least one of the impeachment charges. Only one did: Utah Senator Mitt
Romney, who voted on Article I.
But
quisling - the World War Z definition - also applies to McConnell and his other
conspirators in that they are more afraid of Trump, his enablers and apologists
in the media, and most importantly, Trump supporters. These quislings believe
that if they go along with supporting Trump it will keep him and his supporters
from turning their ire towards them. But by appeasing and even at times, sounding
like Trump, it has resulted in those who are well outside of the bubble to turn
their ire and disgust towards them resulting in them losing their House
majority as well as several statewide offices and state legislative seats in
2018.
Being
these quislings in following Trump to retain their hold on power could lead to
Republicans repeating the fate of 2018 this coming November as well as losing
their Senate majority with the electoral defeat of Senators Susan Collins of
Maine, Joni Ernst of Iowa, Cory Gardner of Colorado, Martha McSally of Arizona,
Thom Tillis of North Carolina, and the two Senators in Georgia: David Perdue and
Kelly Loeffler.
Most
importantly, it could lead to Trump receiving an eviction notice from 1600 Pennsylvania
Avenue.
The
main difference between Quisling and quisling is that Quisling realized he was a
tool after partaking in the Nazi led coup of his country and that his
government was nothing more than a front for his masters. It was only a matter
of time before Quisling and his ministers would be held accountable for their
actions which they were when World War II ended in Europe. The quislings who imitated
the zombies had no epiphany on that their actions would lead to their inevitable
demise whether by the zombies they sought to imitate in their hopes to survive or
by the humans who were fighting the zombies in hopes of reclaiming their livelihoods.
I wonder
which ones Republicans realize they are.
No comments:
Post a Comment